In the Design Build approach, how is team cohesion achieved?

In the Design Build approach, how is team cohesion achieved?

• A. By having a single point of responsibility for design and construction
• B. Through competitive bidding between multiple teams
• C. By segregating design and construction phases
• D. Through limited contractor input during design

Answer: (A)

In the Design Build approach, team cohesion is primarily achieved by having a single point of responsibility for both design and construction. This means that one entity, often a design-build firm, is contracted to manage the entire project from initial design through construction completion. This integrated delivery method fosters collaboration and communication among team members, as everyone works towards a common goal under a unified leadership structure. When the responsibilities for design and construction are consolidated, it reduces the potential for disputes and miscommunication that can arise when these phases are handled by separate parties. This increases efficiency and ensures that the design is not only innovative but also practical and feasible from a construction perspective. The alignment of incentives and goals helps create a strong, cohesive team that is dedicated to the project's success. In contrast, competitive bidding between multiple teams can create an adversarial atmosphere rather than a collaborative one, which may lead to fragmentation. Segregating design and construction phases often contributes to a lack of communication, resulting in inefficiencies and potential conflicts. Limited contractor input during design can also hinder the cohesion necessary for effective project execution, as contractors are less likely to feel invested in the outcome of a project when their expertise is not integrated into the design process. Thus, the emphasis on a single point of responsibility in

In the Design Build approach, team cohesion is primarily achieved by having a single point of responsibility for both design and construction. This means that one entity, often a design-build firm, is contracted to manage the entire project from initial design through construction completion. This integrated delivery method fosters collaboration and communication among team members, as everyone works towards a common goal under a unified leadership structure.

When the responsibilities for design and construction are consolidated, it reduces the potential for disputes and miscommunication that can arise when these phases are handled by separate parties. This increases efficiency and ensures that the design is not only innovative but also practical and feasible from a construction perspective. The alignment of incentives and goals helps create a strong, cohesive team that is dedicated to the project's success.

In contrast, competitive bidding between multiple teams can create an adversarial atmosphere rather than a collaborative one, which may lead to fragmentation. Segregating design and construction phases often contributes to a lack of communication, resulting in inefficiencies and potential conflicts. Limited contractor input during design can also hinder the cohesion necessary for effective project execution, as contractors are less likely to feel invested in the outcome of a project when their expertise is not integrated into the design process.

Thus, the emphasis on a single point of responsibility in